A research refers to as any careful systematic, patient study and investigation in some field of knowledge undertaken to discover or establish facts or principle Ethics is refers to as a study of what is morally right. dignity and welfare of the participants.
Researchers conduct research not just because they enjoy the process but also because research is needed for human improvement. Researchers also require consideration of some ethical concerns. The researcher must carry out the research with respect and concern for theand what is not. When a researcher thinks about ethics he or she must ask himself if it is right to conduct a particular study or carried out certain procedures. Many research carried out unless deception of participant take place.
A research ethics means what a researcher is supposes to do and what he or she is not suppose to do. A research must carry out with respect and concern for the dignity and welfare of the participant. Example a researcher must make a careful analysis of the ethical acceptability of the research. He must ensures that he provide participant with information that remain confidential except that it has been agree up in advance.
A participant is a person who takes part in or becomes involved in a particular activity or a participant is a person who the researcher uses to conduct his or her research. I agree that participant should be deceived, this is because it make the researcher finds what exactly information he or she is looking for. Example; in a study, the headmaster wanted to make a research on how student always fail in Mr. Bediako’s subject. He therefore went to the class to get the information why the student always fails in that particular subject. He deceive the student by telling them they should feel free and tell him why they always fail in that subject because he wanted to change the lecturer. Because the headmaster says he will change the lecturer it makes the student happy so they went ahead to say a lot about the lecturer. The head of the school later on get the accurate information from the student why they fail in the subject.
Such practice must be justified and immediately after participating, the student should be told of such deception and have the reason for it. Imagine what the result of the study may be if he told the student exactly what he was trying to find, will they have help him get the result.
After the research has been completed, you have an ethical responsibility to debrief all participants, you should erase any negative effect that may have resulted from participation. You have to explain to participant thoroughly what has been done, how and why .
Monday, November 2, 2009
CAN ETHICS GO WITH JOURNALISM?
The word “ethics” is connected intrinsically with questions of correct conduct within society. Etymologically, “ethics” comes from the Greek “ethos” meaning “character” which indicates a concern for virtuous people, reliable character and proper conduct. “Morality” is derives from “mores” or custom -- the rules of conduct of a group or society. An initial definition of ethics, then, is the analysis, evaluation, and promotion of correct conduct and/or good character, according to the best available standards.
Journalism is the gathering, evaluating, and distributing facts of current interest. In journalism, reporters research and write stories for print and electronic distribution, often with the guidance of editors or producers.
Ethics asks what we should do in some circumstance, or what we should do as participants in some form of activity or profession. Ethics is not limited to the acts of a single person. Ethics is also interested in the correct practices of governments, corporations, professionals and many other groups. To these questions, ethics seeks a reasoned, principled, position.
Ethics is best conceived of as something we “do,” a form of on-going inquiry into practical problems. Ethics is the difficult practical task of applying norms and standards to ever new and changing circumstances. Ethical questions arise most typically in cases where there is genuine puzzlement about what should be done in various types of situations. There is usually some practical importance or urgency to such questions. Is it ethical for journalists to reveal their sources to the courts, despite their promises of confidentiality? Is it ethical of journalists to invade the privacy of politicians to investigate allegations of misbehavior? One inquires ethically because one is puzzled about how existing principles might apply in a concrete situation.
Journalism ethics and standards comprise principles of ethics and of good practice as applicable to the specific challenges faced by professional journalists. Historically and currently, this subset of media ethics is widely known to journalists as their professional "code of ethics" or the "canons of journalism. The basic codes and canons commonly appear in statements drafted by professional journalism associations and individual print, broadcast, and online news organizations.
Journalism can never be complete unless the follow down ethics is use, and for correct response in journalism, ethics must be apply, which shows that ethics can go with journalism.
Journalism is the gathering, evaluating, and distributing facts of current interest. In journalism, reporters research and write stories for print and electronic distribution, often with the guidance of editors or producers.
Ethics asks what we should do in some circumstance, or what we should do as participants in some form of activity or profession. Ethics is not limited to the acts of a single person. Ethics is also interested in the correct practices of governments, corporations, professionals and many other groups. To these questions, ethics seeks a reasoned, principled, position.
Ethics is best conceived of as something we “do,” a form of on-going inquiry into practical problems. Ethics is the difficult practical task of applying norms and standards to ever new and changing circumstances. Ethical questions arise most typically in cases where there is genuine puzzlement about what should be done in various types of situations. There is usually some practical importance or urgency to such questions. Is it ethical for journalists to reveal their sources to the courts, despite their promises of confidentiality? Is it ethical of journalists to invade the privacy of politicians to investigate allegations of misbehavior? One inquires ethically because one is puzzled about how existing principles might apply in a concrete situation.
Journalism ethics and standards comprise principles of ethics and of good practice as applicable to the specific challenges faced by professional journalists. Historically and currently, this subset of media ethics is widely known to journalists as their professional "code of ethics" or the "canons of journalism. The basic codes and canons commonly appear in statements drafted by professional journalism associations and individual print, broadcast, and online news organizations.
Journalism can never be complete unless the follow down ethics is use, and for correct response in journalism, ethics must be apply, which shows that ethics can go with journalism.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)